0

Projects

0

Programs

0

Glorious Years

0

Team Members

Media & Information

Post-COP29 Sharing: Nepal's Strategic Engagement, Outcomes and Way Forward

The Post-COP 29 Sharing Program, held on December 9, 2024, at Dhokaima Cafe, brought together key stakeholders to reflect on Nepal's participation in COP29. Organized by CANSA Nepal and CEN in collaboration with OXFAM in Nepal, Prakriti Resource Center, and ENPHO, the event focused on reviewing Nepal’s achievements and challenges, providing insights into thematic outcomes, and charting a path forward for impactful engagement at COP30 in Brazil.

Photo 1: Prakash Lama, CEN, Welcoming the participation and setting up the context

In the opening remarks of the program agenda, Manjeet Dhakal, Climate Expert and Advisor to the Minister of MoFE provided a comprehensive overview of the outcomes from COP29 and Nepal's strategic engagement. He reflected on the conclusion of a 9-year-long carbon trade (Article 6.4 & 6.2) initiative at COP29, which opens new pathways for progress, even though its successful implementation is challenging in a long-term context. He also addressed the challenges around climate finance, acknowledging some positive steps but highlighting the lack of satisfactory outcomes in this critical area. On the part of mitigation, the UAE Consensus to subsidize the fossil fuel wasn’t discussed in the negotiation due to time bound which was passed for the next year to discuss on this agenda. Furthermore, Mr. Dhakal emphasized the need for research on climate change impacts across various sectors, underscoring the role of CSOs, NGOs, and academia in advocacy efforts. He concluded by mentioning the hearings in the International Court of Justice, in Hague, Netherlands championed by Pacific students, led by Vanuatu, where the Honorable Foreign Minister of Nepal is sharing the disproportionate impacts faced by Nepal. He viewed this case as a potential catalyst for amplifying the call for climate justice and urging major emitters to take responsibility for their emissions and support vulnerable countries in their climate efforts.

Photo: Manjeet Dhakal, Climate Expert and advisor to the Minister of MoFE, sharing the overview of the COP29 (focused on Mitigation)

The program commenced with a welcome speech and opening remarks by Dr. Sindhu Prasad Dhungana, Joint Secretary, MoFE. He emphasized Nepal's efforts to coordinate technical and political leadership in addressing climate change. Highlighting the importance of robust institutional frameworks, he pointed out gaps in preparedness and the need for collaborative approaches to maximize the nation's impact on the global stage.

Photo: Dr. Sindhu Prasad Dhunghana, Joint Secretary, MoFE sharing Nepal’s participation in COP29, challenges, and way forward

 

Photo: Raju Pandit Chhetri, Executive Director, PRC, sharing brief presentation of the COP29 Outcome and Finance (NCQG)

Raju Pandit Chhetri highlighted both progress and challenges in climate finance and Nepal’s negotiation preparedness at COP29. He discussed advancements under the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG), which aims to scale climate finance to USD 300 billion annually by 2035 and USD 1.3 trillion annually from diverse sources. However, he pointed out the ambiguity in defining climate finance and Nepal's difficulty in accessing funds due to its transition from LDC status and institutional gaps. Many smaller projects, crucial for local adaptation, are deprioritized due to funding thresholds.

He emphasized the importance of institutional strengthening to improve fund mobilization and governance, private sector engagement in adaptation and mitigation projects, and research to build evidence-based advocacy. He noted that Nepal's negotiation efforts were hindered by inadequate coordination, limited capacity, and the absence of a unified stance. While LDCs collectively demanded USD 220 billion annually, their voices were diluted due to a lack of strategic alignment.

To prepare for COP30, he recommended establishing a dedicated climate finance authority, fostering private-sector participation, and aligning national goals with global climate policies. He stressed the need for stronger collaboration across government, civil society, and academia to ensure Nepal’s effective participation in future negotiations. By addressing these gaps, Nepal can better secure resources and influence global climate action.

Thematic Outcome Sharing and Way Forward

The thematic outcomes sharing, successfully moderated by Shreya K.C., Policy Advisor at CEN, provided a dynamic platform for extracting maximum insights from thematic experts. The session encouraged open dialogue and allowed the audience to engage directly with experts on critical issues related to Nepal’s participation in COP29 and the way forward. The session also allowed for an in-depth exploration of Nepal’s challenges and opportunities in various thematic areas, including finance, adaptation, mitigation, gender, youth, and media engagement. Experts representing key thematic areas shared their perspectives, addressed challenges, and proposed actionable solutions to enhance Nepal's climate engagement.

Photo: Shreya K.C., Policy Advisor, CEN,  Facilitating the thematic sharing and discussion

Sandeep Chamling Rai, Global Lead-WWF Nepal, focused on adaptation and loss and damage, discussing progress on the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA), which is set to finalize indicators by COP30. He highlighted the operationalization of the Santiago Network for Loss and Damage (SNLD), which supports vulnerable nations in addressing climate impacts.

Despite these developments, adaptation financing and loss and damage support remain inadequate. He emphasized transformative adaptation approaches that consider future climate scenarios and enhance resilience for both upstream and downstream communities. He also pointed out the need for integrating cultural, biodiversity, and translocation considerations into national adaptation strategies.

Photo: Sandip Chamling Rai (WWF Nepal), Sharing the response to the adaptation and loss & damage outcome

Rajan Thapa, WWF Nepal, shared the critical importance of accountability and transparency in addressing climate change, particularly in the context of the Baku Transparency Report and the Enhancing Transparency Framework (ETP). He highlighted the significant role these tools play in improving the transparency of climate actions and ensuring that all parties meet commitments. Mr. Thapa also pointed out key discussions at the event, focusing on the support needed for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) to build their capacity for transparency and accountability. He noted that the Standing Bodies (SB) must prioritize this support to help vulnerable nations align with global climate goals. Furthermore, Mr. Thapa emphasized that nations must submit their transparency reports by the established deadline of December, as outlined in the Biennial Reporting Templates (BRT). This, he stated, would not only strengthen global cooperation but also ensure that the efforts of all parties are transparent, measurable, and accountable.

Pragya Sherchan, Program Coordinator at PRC, discussed gender dimensions in climate action, emphasizing the extension of the Lima Work Program on Gender for another decade. While gender was recognized as a cross-cutting issue under the Global Goal on Adaptation, she pointed out the resistance from some countries, including Egypt and Saudi Arabia, which weakened discussions on gender-responsive climate finance.

She recommended incorporating gender into adaptation and finance indicators and strengthening advocacy efforts to ensure gender justice. Localizing global gender frameworks, such as the Lima Work Program, and engaging women in decision-making processes were identified as key priorities.

Photo: Pragya Sherchan (left) sharing a response to gender outcome and Aakriti Dotel (right) sharing the Nepalese youth engagement at COP29, challenges, and way forward

Akriti Dotel, Advocacy and Campaign coordinator at NYCA, reflected on youth engagement at COP29, where participation was largely limited to side events and networking. Youth representatives struggled to gain access to negotiation platforms, highlighting a gap in pre-COP capacity-building and resource mobilization.

She stressed the need for meaningful youth involvement in future COPs through training programs, grassroots outreach, and stronger connections between local initiatives and global advocacy. She also emphasized post-COP knowledge sharing to empower communities and amplify youth voices.

Shree Ram Subedi, a Journalist at NRM, highlighted the media’s role in shaping Nepal’s climate narrative. While media coverage of COP29 brought attention to Nepal’s participation, it often focused on peripheral issues rather than substantive outcomes. Subedi called for evidence-based reporting to amplify Nepal’s voice in global forums, promote transparency, and hold policymakers accountable.

He also noted the need for collaboration between media and stakeholders to disseminate climate science effectively and raise awareness of climate finance, adaptation, and mitigation priorities.

Photo: Shree Ram Subedi, Journalist, Response to the Media engagement at COP29, challenges and the way forward

Q&A Highlights

1. Climate Finance and Negotiation Preparedness

  • Question by Laxman Khatri, Li-BIRD:

    • How can Nepal strengthen its negotiation team and ensure better preparation for COP meetings?

    • Which countries opposed the USD 300 billion pledge, and what mechanisms were discussed to implement the finance agenda effectively?

    • What are the challenges in addressing biodiversity loss under climate finance frameworks?

  • Response by Raju Pandit Chhetri:

    • Negotiation preparedness remains a critical gap. Despite efforts to train representatives, many trained individuals could not attend COP29.

    • The pledge of USD 300 billion by 2035 lacked clarity and concrete mechanisms for disbursement, with vague language limiting support for LDCs.

    • Biodiversity loss requires dedicated frameworks and stronger advocacy to integrate into global finance mechanisms.

2. Adaptation and Loss & Damage

  • Question 

    • How can Nepal enhance transformative adaptation and address the cultural, biodiversity, and translocation issues linked to loss and damage?

    • What does the operationalization of the Santiago Network mean for Nepal?

  • Response by Sandeep Chamling Rai, WWF:

    • Transformative adaptation should involve upstream and downstream community resilience, considering future climate scenarios.

    • The Santiago Network offers a framework for addressing loss and damage, but funding commitments remain weak. Nepal must integrate these mechanisms into national policies and advocate for stronger support.

3. Gender Inclusion in Climate Action

  • Question by Shreenidhi from Oxfam Nepal:

    • How can Nepal ensure that gender issues are addressed in climate-related policies and funding mechanisms?

  • Response by Pragya Sherchan:

    • Nepal needs to integrate gender as a measurable indicator in climate adaptation and finance frameworks. Advocacy efforts must address resistance at the international level, such as opposition from some countries to gender-specific policies.

    • Gender action plans, like those outlined in the Lima Work Program, should be localized to ensure practical implementation.

4. Youth Engagement and Grassroots Connection

  • Question by Samiksha from Sarlahi (Representing Youth Groups):

    • What inspired youth participation in COP29, and how can they connect with grassroots communities after the conference?

    • How can real victims of climate change be informed and engaged effectively?

  • Response by Akriti Dotel:

    • Youth participation at COP29 involved side events and networking, but there was a lack of representation in formal negotiations.

    • Moving forward, youth must focus on building capacities and linking grassroots knowledge to global advocacy. This includes post-COP outreach programs and stronger pre-COP training initiatives.

Photo: Questions from the floor

5. Role of Media and Transparency

  • Question by Barsha Parajuli, NGO Federation:

    • Why does Nepal struggle to generate scientific evidence and use case studies to support its climate advocacy?

    • How can the media play a more constructive role in climate transparency and communication?

  • Response by Shree Ram Subedi:

    • Limited institutional coordination and lack of resources hinder Nepal's ability to generate robust scientific evidence.

    • Media must focus on data-driven reporting to amplify Nepal’s position in global forums. Proper mobilization of media is essential for effective transparency and advocacy.

6. Policy-Science Integration and Private Sector Engagement

  • Question by Nagmendra Dahal, CANSA/NWCF:

    • How can Nepal better integrate policy, science, and practice to address climate change?

    • What role can the private sector play in adaptation and mitigation efforts?

  • Response by Raju Pandit Chhetri:

    • Nepal must strengthen the linkage between academia, policy, and grassroots practice. Building human resources and institutional frameworks is key.

    • The private sector can contribute significantly to adaptation and mitigation efforts, but targeted programs are needed to encourage MSMEs (micro, small, and medium enterprises) to participate.

Photo: (Left) Shreedhari Pandey Questions from the floor & (right) Raju Pandit Chhetri responding to questions

Takeaway and Suggestions for COP30


The final session involved group discussions on lessons learned and recommendations for COP30 in Brazil. Participants stressed the importance of institutional reform, research-based advocacy, and strategic partnerships to strengthen Nepal’s position on climate finance, adaptation, and mitigation. The integration of mountain diplomacy into the global agenda was seen as a critical step for Nepal to assert its unique vulnerabilities and contributions.

The Post-COP29 Sharing Program highlighted significant achievements, such as advancements in carbon markets and climate finance frameworks, while identifying gaps in adaptation, gender inclusion, and youth participation. Moving forward, Nepal must focus on institutional strengthening, private sector engagement, and grassroots advocacy to effectively address its climate challenges and leverage global platforms for impactful action. 

Photo: Namindra Dahal, (CANSA Nepal Board) Closing Remarks

Key Outcomes and way forward:

Outcomes 

  1. Highlighted Nepal’s strategic participation and achievements at COP29, including progress in climate finance and carbon market mechanisms.

  2. Identified gaps in access to climate finance, institutional frameworks, and representation of youth and gender in climate action.

  3. Fostered collaboration among government, civil society, academia, youth, and media to address climate challenges collectively.

  4. Provided thematic insights and actionable recommendations for strengthening Nepal’s climate advocacy and negotiation preparedness.

  5. Reinforced the importance of evidence-based advocacy, capacity-building, and grassroots engagement for impactful climate action.

Way Forward

  •  Develop robust institutional frameworks to improve access to climate finance, operationalize carbon trading, and address loss and damage effectively.

  •   Enhance negotiation preparedness through year-round capacity-building for negotiators, youths, and grassroots stakeholders.

  • Strengthen research initiatives and advocate evidence-based policies to support adaptation, mitigation, and biodiversity conservation.

  • Foster private sector participation in renewable energy, low-carbon development, and sustainable infrastructure projects.

  • Localize and implement gender-responsive and youth-inclusive climate action strategies to ensure equitable representation.

  • Leverage media for transparency, awareness, and advocacy to amplify Nepal’s voice in global climate forums.

  • Strategically align national policies with global climate goals, prioritizing mountain diplomacy and cohesive stakeholder collaboration for COP30.

 

CSO Participation In 2nd NDC Revision and COP29

The Pre-COP event titled "CSO Participation in 2nd NDC Revision and COP29" was organized by the CANSA Nepal team and Clean Energy Nepal with the support of Oxfam Nepal, aiming to engage civil societies in discussions surrounding climate action in the lead-up to COP29 and the preparation of 3rd round of Nepal’s NDC, also known as national climate action plans. 

 

Photo: Prakash Lama, CEN, Welcoming all the participants

 

The event commenced with an introduction by Mr. Prakash Lama, Program Coordinator at Clean Energy Nepal. He warmly welcomed all participants and requested everyone to introduce themselves. The audience comprised climate action professionals, experts, and a significant number of youth participants, who are actively engaged in climate action and environment protection in the country.

 

Photo: Prakash Kafle, OXFAM, giving opening remarks

Following the introductions, Mr. Raju Sapkota from the Ministry of Forests and Environment (MoFE) delivered a presentation on ‘Nepal’s preparation for the 3rd round of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC)”. His presentation covered several important aspects:

  • Overview of the NDC, emphasizing its significance in climate action.

  • The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Paris Agreement's purpose and long-term goals.

  • The close interconnection between the long-term temperature goal, adaptation goals, along with financial support received

  •  Overview of Nepal’s NDC implementation plan alongside insights into the NDC 3.0 roadmap, which includes new and updated contributions.

  • Proposed additional sectors for NDC 3.0, which encompass cement, brick, and health among others. Significance of collaborative efforts in updating the NDC.

Photo: Raju Sapkota, MoFE, presenting Nepals NDCs, its status and preparedness for the revision

The program successfully fostered a collaborative environment for participants involved in climate action, allowing for valuable insights into Nepal’s NDC revision process. The interactive discussions, especially during the Q&A sessions, enhanced understanding and engagement among stakeholders.

After the presentation, a question and answer session was held where participants were asked various questions related to the NDC. Mr. Raju addressed all inquiries comprehensively, providing clarity on several critical points.

Photo: Participants raising the questions

 

Some of the questions asked:

  • Dipak Gyawali raised his concerns that Water and Climate issues are not being addressed in the NDCs as well as in the COP process.

  • Keshav Paudel from LiBird raises the concern on NDCs to prioritize agroforestry

  • Other participants raised concerns on NDCs regarding the biogas stocktake, electric vehicle tax, and charging stations issues, whether electricity generation through hydropower is the solution or not, do we not need to think of solar energy and its rate of use to support the installation and use to the Nepalese citizen, etc.

Following Mr. Raju, Mr. Manjeet Dhakal, a prominent climate expert from Nepal with extensive experience in COP negotiations, delivered a presentation focused on COP29. His key points included:

  • Primary themes and objectives of COP29, emphasizing the urgency of addressing climate change.

  • The process of attending COP, who would be attending COP29, and the discussions involved in the conference, including how individuals can follow the discussions online.

  • Emerging geopolitical dynamics that influence climate negotiations.

  • Mapping of decision packages being discussed in the context of COP29.

  • The urgency to raise ambition in limiting global warming to below 1.5 degrees Celsius, stresses the unique context of Nepal.

  • Recent climate events in Nepal, including glacier bursts in the Thame region of Solukhumbu and extreme floods and landslides triggered by unprecedented rainfall at the end of September. Mr. Dhakal highlighted, “The recent climate events serve as a fresh reminder of the urgent need for climate action.”

Photo: Manjeet Dhakal, presenting on COP processes

After Mr. Dhakal's presentation, a question and answer session allowed participants to engage further with the topics discussed. He addressed various questions, providing insights and clarifications on issues related to COP29, the urgency of climate action, and the specific challenges faced by Nepal.

 

Ms. Dikchhya Baral, Network Coordinator of Nepalese Youth for Climate Action (NYCA), concluded the presentation round with a focus on youth involvement in climate issues. Her key points included:

Photo: Dikshya from NYCA presenting on youths preparedness for climate change

  • Specific ways in which youth and children are affected by climate change, including their health, education, and future prospects.

  • Support is needed in order to achieve the objectives of the ACE (Action for Climate Empowerment) which includes education, public participation, and transparency, among others. , 

  • Need for greater support and representation of young voices in climate discussions and,

  •  Importance of supporting youth delegates to attend global conferences citing the example of the international youth climate delegates program led by the COP28 presidency, advocating for youth’s inclusion in decision-making processes and the importance of amplifying their perspectives on global platforms.

Ruchi Chaudhary, Program Manager from CANSA shared that CANSA is a network of 250+ organizations working on different issues in South Asia. Urban heat is a major issue as its impacting majorly in city areas and this issue should be addressed as well.

Closing Remarks 

 

Photo: Ngamindra Dahal, NWCF delivering Closing remarks

At the conclusion of the program, Mr. Ngamindra Dahal from the board of the CANSA team delivered the closing remarks. Mr. Dahal expressed gratitude to all participants and speakers for their contributions and insights. He emphasized the importance of continued collaboration and dialogue in addressing climate challenges and highlighted the critical role of each stakeholder in implementing effective climate policies.

Conclusion 

The program successfully fostered a collaborative environment for participants involved in climate action, allowing for valuable insights into the NDC revision process and COP 29. The interactive discussions, especially during the Q&A sessions, enhanced understanding and engagement among stakeholders.

Our Networks